ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefiarizona state employee raises 2022
Thank you for your suggestions! Windows 10 32bit But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . So thanks a ton, @steve6375! Hiren's BootCD Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. its existence because of the context of the error message. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. plzz help. 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===> Yes. Yes ! I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. A lot of work to do. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? I have a solution for this. This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. Yes. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. Is there any progress about secure boot support? So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. Have a question about this project? In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. I will test it in a realmachine later. The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. @steve6375 By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? to your account. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. edited edited edited edited Sign up for free . Reply. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . Besides, I'm considering that: If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. There are many kinds of WinPE. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Sign in You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. @steve6375 Okay thanks. You signed in with another tab or window. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." Same issue with 1.0.09b1. The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" There are many suggestion to use tools which make an ISO bootable with UEFI on a flash disk, however it's not that easy as you can only do that with UEFI-enabled ISO's. By UEFI enabled ISO's I mean that the ISO files contain a BOOT\EFI directory with a EFI bootloader. Sign in After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please give the exact iso file name. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. Can you add the exactly iso file size and test environment information? plist file using ProperTree. When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso UEFi64? The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). For these who select to bypass secure boot. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. This is also known as file-rolller. Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. 1. Nierewa Junior Member. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. If you pull the USB drive out immediately after finish copy a big ISO file, most probably the file in the USB will be corrupted. The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. Any kind of solution? Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. 4. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. Maybe because of partition type I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). Option 2: bypass secure boot they reviewed all the source code). If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. and leave it up to the user. That's theoretically feasible but is clearly banned by the shim/MS. However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) @chromer030 hello. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. If your PC is unable to process Ventoy as bootable media, then you may need to disable secure boot. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. . So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). Will it boot fine? Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. You can't. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. Also, what GRUB theme are you using? @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. las particiones seran gpt, modo bios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. @ventoy EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. @pbatard The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. my pleasure and gladly happen :) I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. . I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. ", same error during creating windows 7 2. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. Download Debian net installer. Thank you both for your replies. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. You can change the type or just delete the partition. Hiren does not have this so the tools will not work. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. , ctrl+alt+del . I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains I think it's OK. The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB.
